The Book Of Enoch
63
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 1 of 7
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 2 of 7
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 3 of 7
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 4 of 7
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 5 of 7
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 6 of 7
Enoch Book of the "Watchers" Part 7 of 7
View these truths that are covered up too...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7AEI-ivano
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFzbOIVvGl0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARt8r49gDYU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ibzc-4zQkdo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keJERm1Yz40 This one has a complete list of all the Angels that have been omitted in the 6th century.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfttdS1mcDo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4-VZL85eiY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-o3z4Rj8e7c
CommentsLoading...
I cannot open this site. But there is no seven heavens, only three. Only pagans believe it.
I am sorry you are promoting your truth. But Bible is clear that in the days people will claim they have a truth, but it is the lie.
What is it with Pagans and the Bible when it was Pagan before it was Bible--that is like calling the kettle black. Read about Constatine and the Coucil of Necea and Trent and the history of the Bible for starters. I mean no disrespect but flaunting fear is not word of God or Jesus. There are many mistranslation in that Bible also and the Bible isn't the ONLY truth.
Vladimier told you!
You Pagean Priestist!lol,lol,lol
The bible isn't the only truth. Rock on. I loved this hub!
Keep up the great work.
Thank you for commenting. Always a pleasure.
Thank you for showing these! I have been meaning to get a copy of the Book of Enoch!
It is interesting for sure.
Finally I was able to open videos and see and listen. I have a question, when the book of Enoch was written? Who wrote it? It was not Enoch who wrote it, I am sure. The book did not say anything significant new. It look to me as a Roman catholic literature. By the way God said in second Commandment that we should not make any graven images. The Catholic church removed that commandment. The devil like if we read anything but the Bible. The same Catholics do not encourage to read the Bible. Do not misunderstand me I do love Catholics, but not Catholicism.
To jgrimes, the Bible is only Truth. It is not story but Word of God. It is only one, which set you free. Have you ever read the Bible?
To the message that you are pointing to Jgrimes--maybe you should prove it without a doubt.
As for the rest of your comment--it is not Cathlic anything and I don't get why you keep insinnuated my hubs and form posts as comeing from Catholic--when it is not. I am NOT catholic.
Now come from a different angle and read it for what it is and not add words to it.
Lady Guinevere I want to tell you that this is one of the best Hubs I have seen. In the Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible Enoch is Henoch and is commonly understood as one of the two witnesses in Revelation 11:3.
The Catholic Encyclopedia says "in the fourth century the Henoch writings lost credit and ceased to be quoted. After an allusion by an author of the beginning of the ninth century, they disappear from view. The complete text was thought to have perished when it was discovered in two Ethiopic manuscripts in Abyssinia, by the traveler Bruce in 1773."
Part 7 came up "Embedding disabled" so I found it on YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8WIp16SQHI
Note in the videos it mentions Angel Raphael a few times. This is paramount to me for a couple of reasons. First because Angel Raphael is mentioned in the book of Tobias which is in the Catholic Bible. Secondly because St. Raphael was my clans patron saint as they traveled to the new world from the Scottish Highlands. So my ancestors went on to build what is called the first Catholic Church in Upper Canada (now Ontario) which they name St. Raphael's.
I doubt if these videos are a Catholic production even though they have Gregorian Chant in the last couple but to me they fit Catholic belief. This Hub was a real treat for me. I'll have to look at your other ones.
Thanks
Mike
Mike, thansk for the history of this book. Now don't you wonder what other books are lost out there somewhere? I do and the reason why the statement is in the Bible about not adding or taking away is because they thought they had all the books and didn't feel the need to be able to add or subtract---but they did subtract didn't they. All the Angels were listed in the Bible prior to the 6th century. There more than 50 listed and their duties and other things. Half were taken out in the 8th century and the remainder but 3 were taken out in th 15th century.
Actually when you think of it "not adding or taking away" must be meant just for the book of Revelation where the verse is found, cause there were a pile of books 2000 years ago that were clearly not inspired by God. Yeah there were a lot of Apocrypha books, some good, some not so good and some bad. The cannon of the Jewish, Protestant and Catholic Bibles were decided on separately, that's why they are different from each other. If you are interested you can search the Catholic encyclopedia to see if you can find out why each book was left out if you want. For me the Bible is more than enough the way it is to understand the Word of God. I imagine some were left out because the message was already covered in another book or possibly there was just so much. You can read some of the Apocrypha books at the Catholic Encyclopedia, below the Fathers of the Church writings. Each link opens the book but you'd be awful busy cause there are a lot. :-) http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/index.html
If you are interested this page might explain why some books were deemed Apocrypha.
Mike, I have researched that and others too to get a wide range and unbiased opinion on those books. You do know the Gnostic texts and the Coptic texts, I am sure of it. Those were not added for personal reasons to say that they were not of God, BUT they are, just as I am sitting here typing. The Gnostic Texts were from Jesus's own tribe and the way that he was brought up. Peter taught them and guess what happened to him and then Paul's writing became the Bible texts. Don't you ever question why that was? It had nothing to do with God.
There are books in the Bible from both Peter and Paul. From the page above about the Fathers of the Church there are links to some Gnostic books in the Apocrypha section. To tell you the truth after reading the introduction, some parts of the body and the conclusion of this page on Gnosticism I still don't fully understand what it is.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06592a.htm
Like I said the Bible as it is is more than enough for me. I don't think we need to be theologians to understand God enough for our salvation. That's basically what the Catholic catechism is all about, to learn the main points that the Bible teaches us.
These other books are interesting but a little over my head. I like the more simpler form of faith like Therese of Lisieux or the three children seers of Fatima had. Both Therese and Lucy, one of the seers of Fatima were Carmelite nuns. :-)
I have an article on my forum about Lucy and Fatima if you are interested. http://www.earn-cash-make-money-online.com/forum/i
Here's a real nice quote from St. Therese, the Little Flower.
"Love is swift, sincere, pious, pleasant and delightful; strong, patient, faithful, prudent, long-suffering, courageous, and never seeking itself: for where a man seeks himself, there he falls from love."
I invite you to read my other hubs:
http://hubpages.com/hub/I-Heard
http://hubpages.com/hub/How-Rape-Brought-Me-Into-T
I was going to try to send you a private e-mail but you have that turned off.
Right. The Roman Catholic Church discourages any of it's faithfull from reading the Old Testament. I am a bedraggled refugee from the Roman Catholic Church. I never had a bible. All I had was the required New Testament. I just finished read the OT up to II Kings and see why the Church does not like it: ALL THE GENOCIDAL SLAUGHTER. Of course that never happened. The Bible is the worst book of fiction ever written and should have an 18+ classification.
The links have been updated and new ones added.
There has been a link added for those who want to read the book and for those who cannot watch the video's.
For those asking questions about the book of Enoch. One person said that the book was not written by Enoch himself, but I say to you neigther was any of the books ABOUT Jesus. Therefore the assumption that the book of Enoch was taken out becasue of heresay----that would make everything written about Jesus the same.
who has truely read or even study the walk of Jesus.With 36 conterdiction in the N.T. and only 2 in the O.T.What is this _ _ _ _ we're reading?I have walked through the years of this Jesus with the N.T.
mark, I don't understand your comment, but thanks for visiting.
Books that contradict the bible are not for edification nor for doctrinal evidence.
I have a hub, why the book of enoch is crap. It is full of unbiblical sayings, it is not canonized (if you can't believe in canon then i guess you might enjoy a catholic bible better, if so, please say that you are quoting from a catholic bible so as not to purport this heinous book as an addition to canonized Orthodox bible, although enoch is not a RC bible it is pseudopigrapha-the false ascription of a piece of writing to an author. The early church had problems with jews trying to bring this book into the church and you are right about the council of trent. The catholic church established the fallen angels and satan and hell from this book and all the other books, apocrypha and psuedopigrapha, it could find and established and concreted these lies to promote their fear tactics to enrole a scared populace. Good of you to notice this, but the book of enoch was the problem not the solution and catholicism was the vehicle.
brotheryochanan, Thanks for your comment
Have you actually read the Catholic Bible? Have you actually read the King James Bible and know why he made so many changes to it and King James' background. I think that you should read them all and try finding an earlier version too or a literal one before you start making assumptions as to who's version is the correct one. If you read the Bble it is about a JEWISH people--not a Catholic people or any other people--so why do you put the JEWISH people down....you are no better than anyone ese AND Jesus was a JEW and he taught THE WAY and so did Peter and both got killed because they did not prophess what the rulers of ROME wanted. I think you need to do a lot more research for the truth.
Hello. Great hub. I am a great fan of many apochryphal texts, and study them as a sort of hobby. I know some of them are complete fantasy, though there are very definite apochryphal works that are genuine; such as the Books of Baruch, Jasher, and Jubilees, all three of which were mentioned in the Cannonized Books of the Bible.
Also mentioned was a mysterious lost Book by Iddo the Seer, who was Zachariahs father or grandfather, I can't remember which. Also, I believe you may read about at least a couple of these books in Joshua ch.10, v18., and II Samuel ch.1, v.18. I do not have the time right now to do the research, look in your concordance, if I am wrong (I doubt it).
The cannonization process was not without fault. It was done by human beings, and humans are not without error. Also, to those who believe that the KJV was without fault (you know who you are). How does one explain the fact that the KJV added the holiday / word Easter - a definite pagan dillution of Scripture; replacing the word 'Pesach/Passover' with Easter/Ishtar (Acts ch.12, v.4). And there are a few other points in which the 300 dropped the ball. The Complete Jewish Bible CJB is my favorite next is the KJV, and it has a few problems also. That is why we study with a good Bible Concordance.
I love the books of Enoch, but some versions have undoubtibly been corrupted over the years. We may see this, when it is claimed that the Nephilim were 300 feet tall. We know that within the accepted text of the Torah (and books like Joshua), that it is said that they were generally 10' to 18' feet tall. So this is an obvious fact lost in translation. I should also add, that Jude quotes Enoch verbatem, so there is something there. We must study all Scripture carefully and prayerfully. This is so that we may be found acceptable, and ready to give a proper answer, when asked why we have this great hope.
The Book of Enoch is an ancient Book, it is not a more modern apochrypha, such as the Catholic apochryphas. It can be traced back to at least before the times when Christ walked the earth. It also was found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. It is an ancient Hebrew Apochrypha, not a Catholic compilation.
Also, Christians are supposed to show love and patience towards one another. They ought not bicker so much. This issue is not a salvation issue, and in the end it does not really matter. What matters is how you love and regard your maker, and treat your fellow man. When Christ was asked what the greatest commandment was, he replied; "Love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, your mind, and your soul; and love thy neighbor as thyself."
"So flee the passions of your youth; and, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart, pursue righteousness, faithfulness, Love and peace. But stay away from stupid and ignorant controversies - you know that leads to fights, and a slave of the Lord shouldn't fight. On the contrairy, he should be kind to everyone, a good teacher, and not resentful when mistreated." (II Timothy ch.2, vs.22-24 / CJB).
Love is the key, God is Love! (I John ch.4, v.8).
Thank you Joshua Kell, for all the great information. I think you did wonderful without anyone having to do more research.
I don't understand how bible based people can read a book that they know enoch did not write. Neither can we go outside the cannon of scripture. The holy word of god is the bible 66 books, canonized and that's it. People who believe enoch was left out of the bible is not giving god credit. Enoch breeches scripture so many times is almost as hilarious as the lost book of adam and eve, if it were funny at all. Shame on you people for not using your spiritual common sense.
brotheryochanan, You could say the same about Jesus becasue he didn't write the Bible either. You are mislead injto believing that all the books are written in that Bible when the Bible strictly states that they were not and it wasn't for reasons other than they wouldn't fit.
John 20:29-31 (Young's Literal Translation)
29Jesus saith to him, `Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed; happy those not having seen, and having believed.'
30Many indeed, therefore, other signs also did Jesus before his disciples, that are not written in this book;
I agree with verse 30. We will not find other works than jesus did in the bible. 71 days is only accounted for out of his 3.5 yr ministry. It would be a large book indeed but to say they will not 'fit' is weird as a book is only cover, middle and back cover, but whatever. vs 31 states, "but these are written that ye might believe that jesus is the Christ... Nowhere does it say that gods word is incomplete. The bible stands as the word of god and i have to accept that all the steps to making it and publishing it, including canonization are legitimate in the eyes of god, this includes that my outsourcing be few and of good endorsement. If we go outside the word of god we have to back up whatever we find intriguing with the word of god. The bible is not so small that i need more books. If anyone is going to trust other sources you need to be very wary. Good luck to you with this, but i will consider myself not misled as to believe all the words of god that i will ever need are in the bible. Sorry i couldn't get with your hub more. God bless.
brotheryochanan,
Everything is the Word of God---EVERYTHING, not just what you or other people want to hear or not hear but EVERYTHING. You can protest all that you want but it is the truth.
Well it helps if you actually watched the viewo, you may have gotten some answers and then again you nmay have gotten the reinforcements that you are stating. One will never know.........
First let me start by saying Lady Guinevere thanks for posting the videos. It wa
s quite an interesting treat. Next, I am somewhat knowledgeable on the Bible but wouldn't dare acclaim myself to be an authority on the topic. I have a question truly what is your angle Lady Guinevere you say everything is the word of God what did you mean by that(not being argumentative just wanted to understand where you're coming from). As to Brotheryochanan, let's say you're right about the 66 books...I'm very interested in knowing your religious background because included in those 66 books is Jesus instructing us to never find ourselves caught up in quarrels about the faith. I'm not trying to be trouble but it's mis-directed righteous indignation like that, that blinds people's hearts and minds to the true and living God. Lastly I'm inc
lined to agree with Joshua Kell's comments. There's nothing wrong with searching for the truth. Its my personal believe that the simplicity of the Gospel should mixed with faith should be enough to believe in Jesus as lord and saviour of all, but even if you don't that same mighty and powerful God has given us all the choice to to believe or not, who are we to force judge/condemn anyone for not making the same choice. Thanks again Guinevere and in our search for the truth remember the word says "the Truth will set us free". True Love and Peace to you all. JILL
Jill, I had a few experiences that back up my claims about God is in and of every single thing in the Universe. You may read my hub on What I Learned When I Went Home and How Rape Brought Me Into The Light.
Jesus is my teacher and my guide and God is within all of us as in we are in charge of our own existence and what we bring to us. Everything is for our own edification and knowlede and eventually wisdom.
If you wish to learn more about my background then you can read my biography: Whispers From Oz. It startes with the Introduction and goes on and includes 8 chapters. The truth has set me FREE--as FREE as I want to be.
Great video. I'm really interested in learning about the Bible and have been for about three years now when i was nine.
Caleb you can find all the different versions and languages on Biblegateway.com
I wonder at times what our real objectives are pertaining to the scripture in Jesus our father.
It’s observed that everyone seeks for these mysterious revelations amongst scriptures, while the truth has already come to them in flesh and spirit. What then is our aim then in what we perceive and pursue? Why do we seek reference to that which was given to us by scholarly inclination and not by He whom all truth resounds …he withholds nothing that is asked of Him? If it is asked of Him. Woe to the pen that writes on paper against the kingdom of God and his righteousness, for flesh cannot discern the things of God, but only he who seeks Jesus in his truth and worship Him in spirit.
neilbourguy, Thanks for dropping by and leaving a comment. Her's a verse to share with you, Isaiah 41: 21-23 Bring near your cause, saith Jehovah, Bring nigh your mighty ones, saith the king of Jacob. They bring nigh, and declare to us that which doth happen, The first things -- what they [are] declare ye, And we set our heart, and know their latter end, Or the coming things cause us to hear. Declare the things that are coming hereafter, And we know that ye [are] gods, Yea, ye may do good or do evil, And we look around and see [it] together. Lo, ye [are] of nothing, and your work of nought, An abomination -- it fixeth on you.
anjalichugh Level 2 Commenter 3 years ago
Thx for sharing such beautiful content.